Even ordinary Americans are furious with the New York Times both for what it has done, and for its arrogance in doing it. And journalists don't have much popularity to lose.
Last December the New York Times violated the Espionage Act of 1917 - specifically Section 798 which was added by congress in 1950 which reads in part:
"Whoever knowingly and willfully communicates, furnishes, transmits ... or publishes ... any classified information ... concerning the communications intelligence activities of the United States...shall be fined not more than $10,000 or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both."
The December New York Times story revealed that the National Security Agency was listening in on calls from al Qaida suspects abroad to people in the U.S.
Last week the New York Times struck again, revealing details about how the U.S. tracks terrorist financing through a consortium in Belgium.
Because of the worldwide publicity these stories generated, there can be no doubt al Qaida is aware of them, and will change its practices because of them.
"You have gravely endangered the lives of my soldiers," wrote Lt. Tom Cotton, an Army officer stationed in Iraq, in a letter to the Times.
"The next time I hear that familiar explosion...I will wonder whether we could have stopped that bomb had you not instructed terrorists how to evade our financial surveillance."
======================================== Here is what Roosevelt wanted to do in 1942:
The battle of Midway Island was the turning point of the Pacific War. Victory at Midway was possible because the U.S. had broken the Japanese naval code.
The Chicago Tribune spilled the beans in a story that ran under the headline: "NAVY HAD WORD OF JAP PLAN TO STRIKE AT SEA."
President Franklin Delano Roosevelt was furious. He knew that if the Japanese read the story, they'd suspect their codes were compromised, and change them.
The president "initially was disposed to send in the Marines to shut down Tribune tower," wrote Harry Evans. "He was talked out of that, then considered trying (Chicago Tribune publisher Robert) McCormick for treason, which carried a death penalty in wartime.
A grand jury was empaneled, but prosecution was dropped because the Japanese were still using the Purple code, evidently having missed the story. The publicity from a trial would clue them in.
McCormick escaped prosecution but as a result of what he tried to do prompted congress to add Section 798 to the Espionage Act in 1950.
This section of the Act is what the New York Times violated twice in the last year.
Will President Bush do what President Roosevelt wanted to do in 1942?
Link