Non-action by the Obama administration in Libya is dangerous for US citizens wanting to leave the country.
A few in the media have hinted the non-action by Obama is because of fear for the safety U.S. citizens in Libya.
Leaders in the UK aren't using that as an excuse - they are boldly going in to rescue Britons in Libya.
From a report at the link below titled, Ferry Diplomacy:
In a bold and daring move that suggested Churchillian backbone, the British military on Saturday flew military aircraft into Libya to rescue oil workers and others stranded in desert locations amid the escalating violence of Moammar Gaddafi's reign of terror.
Despite the obvious warning signs of turmoil across North Africa and the Middle East, the State Department was caught completely unprepared for unrest in Libya.
How it could not have dawned on the Obama Administration that American citizens and embassy officials would be in grave danger is beyond comprehension.
Why wasn't there a Marine guard at the embassy?
As the report states, in Tripoli -- of all places -- it turns out the only security for the small embassy staff was provided by Libyan nationals!
The embassy officials and staff were sitting ducks for a delusional dictator who had vowed to fight to the death to stay in power.
Where was the U.S. Navy? Couldn't they be sent in to stage a heroic rescue of Americans in harms way?
Instead, the Obama Administration's response was to hire a commercial ferry from Malta.
Once it reached Tripoli harbor, it sat there for three days because the seas were too rough for it to sail.
So once our embattled Americans escaped from our unsafe embassy, they had to endure three days on a ferryboat unsuited to the venture -- all the while wondering if or when Gaddafi's planes or tanks might blow it and them out of the water.
The story ended happily when the ferry finally docked in Malta on Saturday, but that was thanks to pure luck rather than to our government's ability to manage crisis.
It was left to the British to give us a lesson in bold action.
Under Obama's leadership, America has become expert at apologizing, temporizing and speaking in mealy-mouthed, multicultural ambivalence, while remaining unwilling to act boldly or speak clearly as if it were still a leader of the free world.
One commenter said, "In 2008 Americans did not elect a commander-in-chief. They elected a coward-in chief."
Link