From a Weekly Standard report:
David Kirkpatrick of the New York Times has published a lengthy account of the September 11, 2012, terrorist attack in Benghazi, Libya.
While much in Kirkpatrick’s report is not new, the piece is receiving a considerable amount of attention because of this sweeping conclusion: “
Months of investigation by The New York Times, centered on extensive interviews with Libyans in Benghazi who had direct knowledge of the attack there and its context, turned up no evidence that Al Qaeda or other international terrorist groups had any role in the assault.”
But how much effort did Kirkpatrick expend to uncover any possible al Qaeda ties? Judging by the Times’s glaring omissions, not much.
Left out of the Times’s account are the many leads tying the attackers to al Qaeda’s international network.
We owe uncovering of the truth about Benghazi to four dead Americans.
Not one mention of Hillary Clinton in the Kirkpatrick Times whitewash.
Actually, that should be expected. Expect more cleansing of Hillary´s resume before 2016.