In the report at the link below Dr. Krauthammer says he is neither a global warming believer nor a global warming denier.
But he does say that sending tons of carbon dioxide into the atmosphere cannot be good for humanity.
He also believes that those scientists who pretend to know exactly what this will cause in 20, 30 or 50 years are white-coated propagandists.
"The debate is settled,” asserted propagandist in chief Barack Obama in his latest State of the Union address. “Climate change is a fact.” Really?
There is nothing more anti-scientific than the very idea that science is settled, static, impervious to challenge.
Take a non-climate example. It was long assumed that mammograms help reduce breast cancer deaths. This fact was so settled that ObamaCare requires every insurance plan to offer mammograms (for free, no less) or be subject to termination.
Now we learn from a massive randomized study, where 90,000 women were followed for 25 years, that mammograms may have no effect on breast cancer deaths.
The mammogram example was no more ‘settled’ than the so-called ‘settled science’ of claimate change.
So much for settledness.
And climate is less well understood than breast cancer. If climate science is settled, why do its predictions keep changing?
And how is it that the great physicist Freeman Dyson, who did some climate research in the late 1970s, thinks today’s climate-change Cassandras are hopelessly mistaken?
Full report here.