A potpourri of interesting current events, new products, humor and just plain fun, so pull up a chair and stay a while. If your favorite post has disappeared out of sight, you can find it by selecting a category from the left hand side bar.
I am Perry Peterson, a retired auditor and tax accountant. My wife Valeta and I live along the front range of the beautiful Colorado Rocky Mountains.
Please note: some of the links in older postings on this website may have expired by the time you see them.
The LA Times has a report (see link below) titled, “West Coast warming linked to naturally occurring changes.”
Naturally occurring changes in winds, not human-caused climate change, are responsible for most of the warming on land and in the sea along the West Coast of North America over the last century, a study has found.
The analysis challenges assumptions that the buildup of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere has been a significant driver of the increase in temperatures observed over many decades in the ocean and along the coastline from Alaska to California.
Al Gore has not yet commented on this LA Times report.
The imminent climate summit in New York is rapidly turning into an utter embarrassment for President Obama and UN Secretary General Bank Ki-Moon.
The list of prominent world leaders not attending include:
Australian Prime Minister Tony Abbott
Chinese President Xi Jinping
Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi
Canadian Prime Minister Stephen Harper
German Chancellor Angela Merkel
We like the somewhat tongue-in-cheek comment at the end of the report:
Of course, things would probably have been totally different, if the summit organizers had guaranteed that attendees would definitely not have to sit through any more boring climate presentations by former Vice President Al Gore.
Volcanologists have been warning for years of the Yellowstone volcano threat.
If Yellowstone erupted into a massive, ash-spewing volcano, how far might the plume travel across the continental United States?
An eruption could blanket the east coast in a few millimeters and bury the Rocky mountains in several meters of ash.
New York and Washington D.C., would get a light dusting of ash measuring roughly one-tenth of an inch, while San Francisco and Seattle would get a heaping 2 inches. Billings, Montana, meanwhile, would have to dig out from a 70-inch pile up.
A speech by former US Vice-President Al Gore (pictured) was apocalyptic.
‘The North Polar ice cap is falling off a cliff,’ he said. ‘It could be completely gone in summer in as little as seven years. Seven years from now.’
The reality is an area twice the size of Alaska was open water two years ago and is now covered in ice after the arctic ice cap has expanded for the second year in a row.
Misleading as such forecasts are, some people continue to make them. Only last month, while giving evidence to a House of Lords Select Committee inquiry on the Arctic, Cambridge University’s Professor Peter Wadhams claimed that although the Arctic is not ice-free this year, it will be by September 2015.
Asked about this yesterday, he said: ‘I still think that it is very likely that by mid-September 2015, the ice area will be less than one million square kilometres – the official designation of ice-free, implying only a fringe of floes around the coastlines. That is where the trend is taking us.’
For that prediction to come true it would require by far the fastest loss of ice in history. It would also fly in the face of a report last year by the UN Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), which stated with ‘medium confidence’ that ice levels would ‘likely’ fall below one million square kilometres by 2050.
So much for the famous claim by Al Gore that the “science is settled” on climate change and his reliance on the liberal media to cover for his claims.
Global warming computer models are proven wrong as Antarctic sea ice hits new record high with 2.1million square miles more than is usual for time of year.
Predictably, some scientists have suggested the Antarctic ice increase may itself be caused by global warming. But Professor Judith Curry, head of climate science at the Georgia Institute of Technology in Atlanta, said the arguments were not convincing.
Climatologists base their doom-laden predictions of the Earth’s climate on computer simulations.
But these have long been the subject of ridicule because of their stunning failure to predict the pause in warming – nearly 18 years long on some measures – since the turn of the last century.
It’s the same with sea ice. We hear a great deal about the decline in Arctic sea ice, in line with or even ahead of predictions.
But why are environmentalists and scientists so much less keen to discuss the long-term increase in the southern hemisphere?
It’s politics, not science, driving the climate change mania.
Across the globe, there are about one million square kilometres more sea ice than 35 years ago, which is when satellite measurements began.
It’s fair to say that this has been something of an embarrassment for climate modellers. But it doesn’t stop there.
In recent days a new scandal over the integrity of temperature data has emerged, this time in America, where it has been revealed as much as 40 per cent of temperature data there are not real thermometer readings.
July 2 commemorates the supposed UFO crash in Roswell on July 2, 1947.
Some celebrate UFO day on June 24 which is the date that aviator Kenneth Arnold reported what is said to be the first unidentified flying object sighting in the United States. He reported several disk shaped objects flying at incredible speed. Somehow the description changed from flying discs to flying saucers.
The World UFO Day website says the whole point of World UFO day is to celebrate the existence of UFO’s and extra terrestrial life.
Having never seen a flying saucer nor met an extra terrestrial being I won’t be celebrating.
Although I have met several people who may have looked and acted like beings from another world, I’m sure they were not extra terrestrial.
Also, I prefer to use the term flying saucer rather than UFO. Calling them flying saucers puts them in a more humorous category in my mind which is how I think of these unidentified things said to be flying about the sky.
Someday I may actually see a flying saucer. Until then I remain a skeptic.
Since I have admitted to being a flying saucer skeptic I may as well also admit to being a Sasquatch (bigfoot, yeti) skeptic. I will remain a bigfoot skeptic until one is found dead or alive.