A report at the link below says that despite the steady wave of scandals that have begun to erode even the New York Times’ portrayal of Hillary Clinton, her image remains unblemished on Wikipedia.
Since he first started editing her page in June 2005, Hillary’s “Wikipedia watchdog" has been guarding against slanders, accusations, unfair assumptions, and distortions on the high-traffic, heavily footnoted, highly policed Hillary Rodham Clinton Wikipedia page.
His name is Jonathan Schilling and he guards her Wikipedia listing against unauthorized editing.
Despite what Wikipedia claims, nearly anyone can add a Wikipedia article, or edit an existing Wikipedia article.
If no one could alter Wikipedia articles why would Hillary Clinton need to have a dedicated watchdog keeping her entry ‘squeaky’ clean?
Wikipedia: the most quoted - least accurate site on the web
We found so many negative reports about Wikipedia that we created a special category for them on this blog. The links in some of the older reports have expired.